Just like if the lie or fiction became reality
without even no one noted it, just like if the words of some famous writer got
its finality, just like if someone at any moment knew what it is going to
happen in the short term to long term. In that way, certain entity (let’s
assume a person) felt when ignoring the fact in front of its face, unable to
translate and understand the issue taking its previous experience as reference,
and even worse cutting their hands in making a simple act to start catching up “a
petit” at least.

My personal experience has demonstrated that
the brain take unconscious decisions based logically on previous learning but
most of it approached to follow the optimized way. There is no choice that the
brain takes in which this precious body organ can lose. Always it is focused on
getting the goal on the easiest way, which conduct us to the fact that when
this is not gotten, is certainly because we did not get the sufficient
experience before, and not because the brain were unable to chose the right avenue.
Therefore, there is no wrong decision, simply wrong lack of experience, of
reading, of watching, of depth in thoughts. This therefore, leads to the
justified statement supported on reality more than on logics: “being scared on
getting wrong is being afraid of ourselves to advance”.
Reading the main lecture of Orwell (1984), it
is easy to deduce that scare not even a single time formed part of his
predictions and more impressively, this way he could postulate what today is a hard
fact: “Surveillance is on everyone more than ever” through the media you could
not even think, at the distance of just one click. Nowadays, everything start
being monitored, countries set their own ruled-books for controlling social
motion, and more funnier as an unavoidable step, people begin seeing each other
just to analyze their step by step in looking for the thread. Obviously if the
surroundings (why not to say the world itself?) set some ways of addressing the
behavior with a new paradigm, as a mirrored act “les gens” do the same “chose”.
This fact is far from being critizable because it
is a single consequence of increasing the way at which the processes are
effected in the world. In a clearly way: “More people means more food, and this
food is from the farm and from the industry, for this, communication media and high
yield transportation should be faster, so the acceleration in the production
chain is demanded in such a way that people with less resources do not die”. This is a
consequence therefore of keeping human kind alive and closer. Distance in this
route, start signifying less and an unimaginable world arise to keep us
entertained. Surveillance is justified because, as always happens, exist the
person of group of persons which out-of-law want to take advantage on the guys
that trust in the system, so as it is expected, punishment to these people in
order to maintain the system and normal persons happy, is permitted.
How a person at the mid of 50ths can infer such
a behavior in people if even it did not know about creation of transistors,
nanointeractions control, surface functionalization, alternative approaches to
afford energy-related challenges and, the personal general distributed
perspective in these current times of sexual freedom, perversion and
pleasure-full acts. Orwell on its inputs at his famous novel put as at the
reality of our lives. Everyone see the other, satellite see us also,
boy/girl-friend sees their counterparts, so from now and always we are going to
be watched for our goodness or badness but, as a fact that does not admit back
on time.
Comments
Post a Comment